Why has the strategic bombing offensive against Germany in World War Essay

Why has the strategic bombing offensive against Germany in World War Two often been viewed as morally indefensible - Essay Example he British bombing of Dresden, a city not much smaller than Manchester, towards the end of the war is widely acclaimed as a war crime because this cultural capital of Germany was filled with refugees trying to escape Allied bombing and was of no military value. This and the indiscriminant bombings of other German cities are largely viewed by historians as retaliation for the London bombings by the Germans. Were the bombing campaigns an act strictly motivated by revenge and should therefore be regarded as morally reprehensible or were they the result of a necessary and successful strategy that may have gone a little too far? This question is the focus of the following discussion which attempts to explain why these bombings of civilian targets are generally regarded as an indefensible, shameful act perpetrated by the Allies. The Allies, particularly the British, have been likely rightfully vilified for decimating German towns and civilian populations near the end of the war essentially in retaliation for the Luftwaffe bombing raids over London. This strategic bombing campaign took the lives of an estimated 600,000 German civilians. However, the reality of the situation must be kept in proper context. Germany started the war, killed approximately 12 million civilians including six million in concentration camps and would have taken a greater toll if they had beaten the Allied forces. The German’s and British certainly were not the only nations that committed wartime atrocities. Many hundreds of thousands of German prisoners who were taken by the Americans died in prison camps. Witnesses told of gaunt bodies wearing clothing smeared with diarrhea huddled in muddy holes with no shelter and perhaps a rotten potato to eat. Many had to eat grass and drink urine to survive. According to the American Red Cross, at least 98 percent of American prisoners in German prison camps survived but the West German government stated that more than one million German

EU Law Assignment Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

EU Law Assignment - Case Study Example The Fictitious Carrier Pigeons Directive 2004 provides that all carrier pigeons must be subject to quarterly veterinary inspections, their health problems must be promptly remedied, and that the animals must be kept separately from other animals, until they are certified as being in good health. If certification does not take place within three months of the inspection reporting problems, the animals must be slaughtered. More importantly the directive provides that a fund must be set up to compensate farmers whose animals are slaughtered pursuant to the directive. The directive was to be transposed into UK law on the 1st of January and the time has expired as at now .In such circumstances the Council would be entitled to commence a formal Article 226 action if subtle persuasion and warnings failed to convince the UK that it should implement the directive within reasonable time .According to Article 226 "if the commission considers that a member state has failed to fulfill an obligati on under this Treaty it shall deliver a reason opinion of this matter". Therefore once the commission has been alerted regarding this implementing omission of the UK.1 Following the reply from the member state or after a reasonable time where no reply is received the commission will then deliver a reasoned opinion which records the reasons for the failure UK to implement this directive which required the setting up of a fund and the treatment of such pigeon's.2.If the matter is taken to the ECJ in this regard, its judgment would be merely declaratory; the member states are required under Art 228 to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment. It seems here that the UK does not have a defence that could be raised for non compliance because under Art 10EC the member states are required to fulfill all their community law obligations and Art 292 obliges Member States not to seek other solutions to disputes. S and A are advised that if the UK does not comply with this judgmen t a further action may lie against their government under Art 226 for a breach of Art 228.3 Remedies for S and A Secondly, coming to the remedies available to S and A because of the loss of profit they have suffered due to the death of their gaming pigeons ,they are advised to start an action for compensation for the dead pigeons with a UK court. They can rely on community law within their domestic courts but only on the condition that the directive must have either been already implemented by the UK (which it has not been done so here) or give rise to direct effects. As mentioned before the directive has already passed its deadline for implementation by the UK. Therefore subject to the application of the doctrine of direct effect in this regard S and A might have a possible remedy under EU law. The doctrine of direct effect is one of the most important aspects of the community law. Summarised, it states that community law creates legal rights which are directly enforceable by individuals in member states. This was held in the case of Van Gend En Loos v Nederlandse Belastingadministratie (case 26/62) as follows:4If a legal instrument of the EU confers direct effects then the individual has locus standi to enforce a right under community law in national courts and the European Court of Justice (ECJ) .Under Article 249 EC

The Greatest Prime Minister in Canadian History for Promoting Ethnic Essay

The Greatest Prime Minister in Canadian History for Promoting Ethnic Diversity and Communities was Pierre Elliott Trudeau - Essay Example Declarations and policies which were centered on creating a diverse community were then made under his jurisdiction (Wood, Gilbert, 2005). The continuous agenda of Trudeau and the way in which he promoted multiculturalism is one which continues to be used today with initiatives through the policies and political actions which were first implemented by Trudeau. The concept of multiculturalism was pushed by Trudeau because of the changing climate and environment in Canada and the world. Trudeau came into power after World War II and through various world revolutions based on cultural diversity and ethnic equality. Canada was also experiencing a large amount of immigrant pressures from other regions, specifically which began as an offset from World War II. The social pressures of this time were based on the desire to offer minorities the same potential as others in society while integrating opportunity. Trudeau followed these social pressures and stigmas with his own vision of creating an ethnically diverse set of communities through policies and procedures expected in society (Driedger, 2001). When Trudeau came into power in 1968, his main agenda was to promote the concept of ethnic diversity. From the 17th century, Canada had a large influx of immigration that came into the country. Before this time, there were also diversity promotions in terms of both Aboriginal land and those who had found the contemporary nation of Canada. As this grew and continued to divide, ethnic communities began to be more visible within the Canadian territories, specifically because of physical and racial differences. The largest influx came during the World Wars, based on those from Europe that began to migrate to America from the war. Asian communities also began to establish during this time. As the racial differences were noted, it was also expected that a